Integrevise for University of Kentucky

Make every level of AI use accountable to student understanding.

Integrevise adds a short adaptive oral discussion after submission, grounded in the assignment brief, rubric and the student’s own work. It gives UK faculty reviewable evidence of individual understanding and returns personalised feedback—without relying on AI detection or scheduling a live viva for every learner.

Explore Integrevise See the value

Value at every level

Make every level of AI use accountable to learning.

Integrevise adds a practical evidence layer while preserving assignment-level expectations, faculty judgement and the assessments already in place.

For Kentucky

Consistent evidence across varied AI use.

Create reviewable learning evidence across assignment-level AI expectations, supporting fairness, quality and programme review.

For Faculty

Keep the scale and the judgement.

Retain the selected AI-use level, brief, rubric and final decision while reviewing structured oral evidence without live interviews.

For Students

Explain learning, not detector risk.

Give students a transparent way to explain choices and receive feedback grounded in their own work.

Peer reviewed2026University setting

Evidence before adoption

A practical approach, tested in higher education.

Integrevise's adaptive oral approach has been evaluated in a university setting and published in the peer-reviewed journal Trends in Higher Education.

Read the peer-reviewed study

Directly aligned with Kentucky

The principles are in place. Integrevise makes them operational.

Kentucky's Student AI Use Scale gives instructors and students a shared vocabulary for assignment-specific expectations, supported by institution-wide faculty guidance and explicit concern for fairness beyond detection. Integrevise makes that framework operational by creating human-reviewed evidence of understanding at any permitted-use level.

Student AI Use Scale Updated faculty guidance Fairness beyond detection

Kentucky prioritisesClear AI-use expectations, fairness and faculty ownership

Integrevise addsEvidence of individual understanding

A simple next step

Compare AI-use and assessment priorities.

A short conversation is enough to compare priorities, explore fit and decide whether the approach deserves a closer look.

Book a 20-minute conversation No preparation, module selection or assessment redesign needed.